Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From MWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Proof:)
m (→‎Proof:)
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
=== Leibniz' differentiation rule ===
 
=== Leibniz' differentiation rule ===
  
−
For <math>f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright B x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T}</math>, and <math>s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\}</math>, choosing <math>\curvearrowright D a(x) = a(\curvearrowright B x)</math> and <math>\curvearrowright D b(x) = b(\curvearrowright B x)</math> it holds that<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).</math></div>
+
For <math>f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T}</math> and <math>s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\}</math>, choosing <math>\curvearrowright a(x) = a(\curvearrowright x)</math> and <math>\curvearrowright b(x) = b(\curvearrowright x)</math>, it holds that<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)).</math></div>
  
 
==== Proof: ====
 
==== Proof: ====
−
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright Bx,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}Dt}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).\square\end{aligned}</math></div>
+
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright x,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}t}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)).\square\end{aligned}</math></div>
  
 
=== Beal's theorem ===
 
=== Beal's theorem ===
−
Equation <math>a^m + b^n = c^k</math> where <math>a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*}</math> and <math>k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> implies gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1.</math>
+
Equation <math>a^m + b^n = c^k</math> for <math>a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*}</math> and <math>k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> implies gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1.</math>
  
 
==== Proof: ====
 
==== Proof: ====
−
Proof: Real points between <math>r, s \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{Q}</math> do not avoid that every nontrivial equation for <math>c^k > 1</math> is given by <math>(a^{m-r} + ib^{n-s})(a^r - ib^s) =c^k +i(a^rb^{n-s} - a^{m-r}b^s)</math> where all relations <math>a^{m-\hat{r}} = b^{n-\hat{s}}</math> then imply <math>p \mid</math> gcd<math>(a, b, c)</math> as well as the claim for <math>p \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{P}.\square</math>
+
For <math>b^n = (c^{kq}-a^{mr})\left(\tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} + \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}}\right) = c^k - a^m + c^{kq} \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}} - \tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} a^{mr}</math>, the function <math>f(q,r) := c^{k(\hat{q}-1)} - a^{m(\hat{r}-1)} = 0</math> is continuous in <math>q, r \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{R}_{>0}</math> and <math>(q_0, r_0) = \left(\check{1}, \check{1}\right)</math> solves the equation. Every further solution in fractions yields after exponentiation gcd<math>(a, c) > 1</math> and thus proves the claim.<math>\square</math>
  
 
=== Conclusion: ===
 
=== Conclusion: ===
−
The preceding theorem enables an infinite descent because of gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1</math> such that no <math>n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> satisfies <math>a^n + b^n = c^n</math> for arbitrary <math>a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square</math>
+
The Fermat-Catalan conjecture can be proven analogously and an infinite descent implies because of gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1</math> that no <math>n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> satisfies <math>a^n + b^n = c^n</math> for arbitrary <math>a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square</math>
  
 
== Recommended reading ==
 
== Recommended reading ==

Revision as of 08:15, 4 March 2024

Welcome to MWiki

Theorems of the month

Leibniz' differentiation rule

For [math]\displaystyle{ f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\} }[/math], choosing [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright a(x) = a(\curvearrowright x) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright b(x) = b(\curvearrowright x) }[/math], it holds that

[math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)). }[/math]

Proof:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright x,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}t}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)).\square\end{aligned} }[/math]

Beal's theorem

Equation [math]\displaystyle{ a^m + b^n = c^k }[/math] for [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] implies gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1. }[/math]

Proof:

For [math]\displaystyle{ b^n = (c^{kq}-a^{mr})\left(\tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} + \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}}\right) = c^k - a^m + c^{kq} \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}} - \tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} a^{mr} }[/math], the function [math]\displaystyle{ f(q,r) := c^{k(\hat{q}-1)} - a^{m(\hat{r}-1)} = 0 }[/math] is continuous in [math]\displaystyle{ q, r \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{R}_{\gt 0} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ (q_0, r_0) = \left(\check{1}, \check{1}\right) }[/math] solves the equation. Every further solution in fractions yields after exponentiation gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, c) \gt 1 }[/math] and thus proves the claim.[math]\displaystyle{ \square }[/math]

Conclusion:

The Fermat-Catalan conjecture can be proven analogously and an infinite descent implies because of gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1 }[/math] that no [math]\displaystyle{ n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] satisfies [math]\displaystyle{ a^n + b^n = c^n }[/math] for arbitrary [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square }[/math]

Recommended reading

Nonstandard Mathematics

Retrieved from "https://en.mwiki.de/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=297"