Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From MWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(RU method)
m (→‎Proof:)
(55 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
= Welcome to MWiki =
 
= Welcome to MWiki =
−
== Theorem of the month ==
+
== Theorems of the month ==
−
=== RU method ===
+
=== Leibniz' differentiation rule ===
−
If the linear system (LS) <math>Ax = b \in  {}^{\nu}\mathbb{Q}^{n}</math> can be uniquely solved for <math>n \in {}^{\nu}\mathbb{N}^*</math>, the ''root of unity method (RU method)'' computes <math>x \in {}^{\nu}\mathbb{Q}^{n}</math> for <math>A \in {}^{\nu}\mathbb{Q}^{n \times n}</math> in <math>\mathcal{O}(n^2)</math>.
 
  
−
=== Proof and algorithm ===
+
For <math>f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T}</math> and <math>s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\}</math>, choosing <math>\curvearrowright a(x) = a(\curvearrowright x)</math> and <math>\curvearrowright b(x) = b(\curvearrowright x)</math>, it holds that<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)).</math></div>
−
Let <math>R_1 := (r_{1jk}) = (r_{1kj}) = R_1^T \in {}^{\nu}\mathbb{C}^{n \times n}, n \in {}^{\nu}2\mathbb{N}^*, r_{11k} := 1</math> and for <math>j &gt; 1</math> sowie <math>n_{jk} := j + k - 3</math> as well as <math>r_{1jk} := \hat{n}e^{i\tau n_{jk}/n}</math> both <math>n_{jk} &lt; n</math> and <math>r_{1jk} := \hat{n}e^{i\tau(n_{jk} - \acute{n})/n}</math> for <math>n_{jk} \ge n</math>. Interchanging the first and <math>j</math>-th row resp. column position and correspondingly interchanging the remaining row and column positions yields matrices <math>R_j = R_j^T</math> for <math>j &gt; 1</math>. That implies obviously rk<math>(R_j) = n</math>. If <math>A(x - x^\prime) = (1 - x_j, ..., 1 - x_j)^T</math> and <math>Ax^\prime = b</math> imply <math>x_j = 1</math> for all <math>j</math>, then most likely rk<math>(A) = n</math>.
 
  
−
If <math>a_{jk} \le 0</math> is given for at least one couple <math>(j, k)</math> and <math>A := (a_{jk})</math>, then compute the sums <math>s_0 := \sum\limits_{j=1}^m{b_j\varepsilon^j}</math> for an arbitrary transcendental number <math>\varepsilon</math> and <math>s_k := \sum\limits_{j=1}^m{a_{jk}\varepsilon^j} \ne 0</math> for all <math>k</math>. Replace <math>x_k</math> by <math>-x_k</math> for <math>s_k &lt; 0</math>. Then add a multiple of <math>s^Tx</math> resp. <math>s_0</math> to <math>Ax = b</math>, such that now <math>a_{jk} &gt; 0</math> holds for all <math>(j, k)</math>. From <math>D_j := (d_{jk}), d_{jk} = \delta_{jk}/\prod\limits_{m=1}^n{a_{jm}}</math> and <math>C_j := D_j R_j = (c_{jk})</math>, it follows that <math>x_j^\prime = (AC_jx^\prime)_j = (C_jb)_j</math> for the Kronecker delta <math>\delta_{jk}</math>. If, however, <math>x_j^\prime = 0 \ne b_j</math> holds for one <math>j</math>, the LS cannot be solved.<math>\square</math>
+
==== Proof: ====
 +
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright x,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}t}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)).\square\end{aligned}</math></div>
 +
 
 +
=== Beal's theorem ===
 +
Equation <math>a^m + b^n = c^k</math> for <math>a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*}</math> and <math>k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> implies gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1.</math>
 +
 
 +
==== Proof: ====
 +
For <math>b^n = (c^{kq}-a^{mr})\left(\tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} + \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}}\right) = c^k - a^m + c^{kq} \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}} - \tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} a^{mr}</math>, the function <math>f(q,r) := c^{k(\hat{q}-1)} - a^{m(\hat{r}-1)} = 0</math> is continuous in <math>q, r \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{R}_{>0}</math> and <math>(q_0, r_0) = \left(\check{1}, \check{1}\right)</math> solves the equation. Every further solution in fractions yields after exponentiation gcd<math>(a, c) > 1</math> and thus proves the claim.<math>\square</math>
 +
 
 +
=== Conclusion: ===
 +
The Fermat-Catalan conjecture can be proven analogously and an infinite descent implies because of gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1</math> that no <math>n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> satisfies <math>a^n + b^n = c^n</math> for arbitrary <math>a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square</math>
  
−
'''Remark:''' Extending the theorem to complex numbers and over- or underdetermined LS is easy.
 
 
== Recommended reading ==
 
== Recommended reading ==
  

Revision as of 08:15, 4 March 2024

Welcome to MWiki

Theorems of the month

Leibniz' differentiation rule

For [math]\displaystyle{ f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\} }[/math], choosing [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright a(x) = a(\curvearrowright x) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright b(x) = b(\curvearrowright x) }[/math], it holds that

[math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)). }[/math]

Proof:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright x,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}t}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright x)}{f(\curvearrowright x,t){\downarrow}t} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}t}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright x,a(x)).\square\end{aligned} }[/math]

Beal's theorem

Equation [math]\displaystyle{ a^m + b^n = c^k }[/math] for [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] implies gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1. }[/math]

Proof:

For [math]\displaystyle{ b^n = (c^{kq}-a^{mr})\left(\tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} + \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}}\right) = c^k - a^m + c^{kq} \tilde{a}^{m\acute{r}} - \tilde{c}^{k\acute{q}} a^{mr} }[/math], the function [math]\displaystyle{ f(q,r) := c^{k(\hat{q}-1)} - a^{m(\hat{r}-1)} = 0 }[/math] is continuous in [math]\displaystyle{ q, r \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{R}_{\gt 0} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ (q_0, r_0) = \left(\check{1}, \check{1}\right) }[/math] solves the equation. Every further solution in fractions yields after exponentiation gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, c) \gt 1 }[/math] and thus proves the claim.[math]\displaystyle{ \square }[/math]

Conclusion:

The Fermat-Catalan conjecture can be proven analogously and an infinite descent implies because of gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1 }[/math] that no [math]\displaystyle{ n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] satisfies [math]\displaystyle{ a^n + b^n = c^n }[/math] for arbitrary [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square }[/math]

Recommended reading

Nonstandard Mathematics

Retrieved from "https://en.mwiki.de/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=297"