Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From MWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Intex method)
(Proof:)
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
= Welcome to MWiki =
 
= Welcome to MWiki =
== Theorem of the month ==
+
== Theorems of the month ==
The intex method solves every solvable LP in <math>\mathcal{O}(\omega{\vartheta}^{2})</math>.
+
=== Leibniz' differentiation rule ===
  
== Proof and algorithm ==
+
For <math>f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright B x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T}</math>, and <math>s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\}</math>, choosing <math>\curvearrowright D a(x) = a(\curvearrowright B x)</math> and <math>\curvearrowright D b(x) = b(\curvearrowright B x)</math> it holds that<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).</math></div>
Let <math>z := m + n</math> and <math>d \in [0, 1]</math> the density of <math>A</math>. First, normalise and scale <math>{b}^{T}y - {c}^{T}x \le 0, Ax \le b</math> as well as <math>{A}^{T}y \ge c</math>. Let <math>P_r := \{(x, y)^T \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}^{z} : {b}^{T}y - {c}^{T}x \le r \in [0, \breve{r}], Ax - b \le \underline{r}_m, c - {A}^{T}y \le \underline{r}_n\}</math> have the radius <math>\breve{r} := s|\min \; \{b_1, ..., b_m, -c_1, ..., -c_n\}|</math> and the scaling factor <math>s \in [1, 2]</math>. It follows <math>\underline{0}_{z} \in \partial P_{\breve{r}}</math>. By the strong duality theorem, the LP min <math>\{ r \in [0, \breve{r}] : (x, y)^T \in P_r\}</math> solves the LPs max <math>\{{c}^{T}x : c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}^{n}, x \in {P}_{\ge 0}\}</math> and min <math>\{{b}^{T}y : y \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}^{m}, {A}^{T}y \ge c\}</math>.
 
  
 +
==== Proof: ====
 +
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright Bx,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}Dt}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).\square\end{aligned}</math></div>
  
Its solution is the geometric centre <math>g</math> of the polytope <math>P_0</math>. For <math>p_k^* := \text{min}\,\check{p}_k + \text{max}\,\check{p}_k</math> and <math>k = 1, ..., \grave{z}</math> approximate <math>g</math> by <math>p_0 := (x_0, y_0, r_0)^T</math> until <math>||\Delta p||_1</math> is sufficiently small. The solution <math>t^o(x^o, y^o, r^o)^T</math> of the two-dimensional LP min <math>\{ r \in [0, \breve{r}] : t \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}_{&gt; 0}, t(x_0, y_0)^T \in P_r\}</math> approximates <math>g</math> better and achieves <math>r \le \hat{2}\breve{r}</math>. Repeat this for <math>t^o(x^o, y^o)^T</math> until <math>g \in P_0</math> is computed in <math>\mathcal{O}({}_2\breve{r}^2dmn)</math> if it exists.
+
=== Beal's theorem ===
 +
Equation <math>a^m + b^n = c^k</math> where <math>a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*}</math> and <math>k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> implies gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1.</math>
  
 +
==== Proof: ====
 +
Proof: Real points between <math>r, s \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{Q}</math> do not avoid that every nontrivial equation for <math>c^k > 1</math> is given by <math>(a^{m-r} + ib^{n-s})(a^r - ib^s) =c^k +i(a^rb^{n-s} - a^{m-r}b^s)</math> where all relations <math>a^{m-\hat{r}} = b^{n-\hat{s}}</math> then imply <math>p \mid</math> gcd<math>(a, b, c)</math> as well as the claim for <math>p \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{P}.\square</math>
  
Solving all two-dimensional LPs <math>\text{min}_k r_k</math> by bisection methods for <math>r_k \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}</math> and <math>k = 1, ..., z</math> in <math>\mathcal{O}({\vartheta}^2)</math> each time determines <math>q \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}^k</math> where <math>q_k := \Delta p_k \Delta r_k/r</math> and <math>r := \text{min}_k \Delta r_k</math>. Let simplified <math>|\Delta p_1| = … = |\Delta p_{z}|</math>. Here min <math>r_z</math> for <math>p^* := p + wq</math> and <math>w \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}</math> would be also to solve. If <math>\text{min}_k \Delta r_k r = 0</math> follows, stop computing, otherwise repeat until min <math>r = 0</math> or min <math>r &gt; 0</math> is sure.
+
=== Conclusion: ===
 +
The preceding theorem enables an infinite descent because of gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1</math> such that no <math>n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> satisfies <math>a^n + b^n = c^n</math> for arbitrary <math>a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square</math>
 +
 
 +
== Recommended reading ==
  
== Recommended readings ==
 
 
[https://en.calameo.com/books/003777977258f7b4aa332 Nonstandard Mathematics]
 
[https://en.calameo.com/books/003777977258f7b4aa332 Nonstandard Mathematics]
  
 
[[de:Hauptseite]]
 
[[de:Hauptseite]]

Revision as of 15:58, 1 March 2023

Welcome to MWiki

Theorems of the month

Leibniz' differentiation rule

For [math]\displaystyle{ f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright B x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T} }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\} }[/math], choosing [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright D a(x) = a(\curvearrowright B x) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright D b(x) = b(\curvearrowright B x) }[/math] it holds that

[math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)). }[/math]

Proof:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright Bx,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}Dt}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).\square\end{aligned} }[/math]

Beal's theorem

Equation [math]\displaystyle{ a^m + b^n = c^k }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] implies gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1. }[/math]

Proof:

Proof: Real points between [math]\displaystyle{ r, s \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{Q} }[/math] do not avoid that every nontrivial equation for [math]\displaystyle{ c^k \gt 1 }[/math] is given by [math]\displaystyle{ (a^{m-r} + ib^{n-s})(a^r - ib^s) =c^k +i(a^rb^{n-s} - a^{m-r}b^s) }[/math] where all relations [math]\displaystyle{ a^{m-\hat{r}} = b^{n-\hat{s}} }[/math] then imply [math]\displaystyle{ p \mid }[/math] gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) }[/math] as well as the claim for [math]\displaystyle{ p \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{P}.\square }[/math]

Conclusion:

The preceding theorem enables an infinite descent because of gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1 }[/math] such that no [math]\displaystyle{ n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] satisfies [math]\displaystyle{ a^n + b^n = c^n }[/math] for arbitrary [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square }[/math]

Recommended reading

Nonstandard Mathematics