Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From MWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Three-cube theorem and Fickett's theorem)
(→‎Proof:)
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
= Welcome to MWiki =
 
= Welcome to MWiki =
 
== Theorems of the month ==
 
== Theorems of the month ==
−
=== Three-Cube Theorem ===
+
=== Leibniz' differentiation rule ===
  
−
By Fermat’s little theorem, <math>k \in {}^{\omega }{\mathbb{Z}}</math> is sum of three cubes if and only if
+
For <math>f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright B x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T}</math>, and <math>s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\}</math>, choosing <math>\curvearrowright D a(x) = a(\curvearrowright B x)</math> and <math>\curvearrowright D b(x) = b(\curvearrowright B x)</math> it holds that<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).</math></div>
  
−
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>k=(n - a)^3 + n^3 + (n + b)^3 = 3n^3 - a^3 + b^3+ 3c \ne \pm 4\mod 9</math></div>
+
==== Proof: ====
 +
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright Bx,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}Dt}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).\square\end{aligned}</math></div>
  
−
and <math>a, b, c, d, m, n \in {}^{\omega }{\mathbb{Z}}</math> implies both <math>(a^2 + b^2)n - (a - b)n^2 = c =: dn</math> and <math>m^2 = n^2 - 4(b^2 - bn + d)</math> for <math>2a_{1,2} = n \pm m.\square</math>
+
=== Beal's theorem ===
 +
Equation <math>a^m + b^n = c^k</math> where <math>a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*}</math> and <math>k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> implies gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1.</math>
  
−
=== Fickett's Theorem ===
+
==== Proof: ====
 +
Proof: Real points between <math>r, s \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{Q}</math> do not avoid that every nontrivial equation for <math>c^k > 1</math> is given by <math>(a^{m-r} + ib^{n-s})(a^r - ib^s) =c^k +i(a^rb^{n-s} - a^{m-r}b^s)</math> where all relations <math>a^{m-\hat{r}} = b^{n-\hat{s}}</math> then imply <math>p \mid</math> gcd<math>(a, b, c)</math> as well as the claim for <math>p \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{P}.\square</math>
  
−
For any relative positions of two overlapping congruent rectangular <math>n</math>-prisms <math>Q</math> and <math>R</math> with <math>n \in {}^{\omega }\mathbb{N}_{\ge 2}</math> and <math>m := 2n - 1</math>, it can be stated for the exact standard measure <math>\mu</math>, where <math>\mu</math> for <math>n = 2</math> needs to be replaced by the Euclidean path length <math>L</math>, that:
+
=== Conclusion: ===
−
 
+
The preceding theorem enables an infinite descent because of gcd<math>(a, b, c) > 1</math> such that no <math>n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}</math> satisfies <math>a^n + b^n = c^n</math> for arbitrary <math>a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square</math>
−
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\hat{m} &lt; r := \mu(\partial Q \cap R)/\mu(\partial R \cap Q) &lt; m.</math></div>
 
−
 
 
−
==== Proof: ====
 
−
Since the underlying extremal problem has its maximum for rectangles with the side lengths <math>s</math> and <math>s + 2d0</math>, min <math>r = s/(3s - 2d0) \le r \le</math> max <math>r = (3s - 2d0)/s</math> holds. The proof for <math>n &gt; 2</math> is analogous.<math>\square</math>
 
  
 
== Recommended reading ==
 
== Recommended reading ==

Revision as of 16:58, 1 March 2023

Welcome to MWiki

Theorems of the month

Leibniz' differentiation rule

For [math]\displaystyle{ f: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{\grave{n}} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, a, b: {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}^{n} \rightarrow {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K}, \curvearrowright B x := {(s, {x}_{2}, ..., {x}_{n})}^{T} }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ s \in {}^{(\omega)}\mathbb{K} \setminus \{{x}_{1}\} }[/math], choosing [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright D a(x) = a(\curvearrowright B x) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \curvearrowright D b(x) = b(\curvearrowright B x) }[/math] it holds that

[math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)). }[/math]

Proof:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{aligned}\tfrac{{\downarrow} }{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right) &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{f(x,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\left( {\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{(f(\curvearrowright Bx,t)-f(x,t)){\downarrow}Dt}+{\uparrow}_{b(x)}^{b(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt}-{\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{a(\curvearrowright Bx)}{f(\curvearrowright Bx,t){\downarrow}Dt} \right)}/{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}\; \\ &={\uparrow}_{a(x)}^{b(x)}{\tfrac{{\downarrow} f(x,t)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}{\downarrow}Dt}+\tfrac{{\downarrow} b(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,b(x))-\tfrac{{\downarrow} a(x)}{{\downarrow} {{x}_{1}}}f(\curvearrowright Bx,a(x)).\square\end{aligned} }[/math]

Beal's theorem

Equation [math]\displaystyle{ a^m + b^n = c^k }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}^{*} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ k, m, n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] implies gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1. }[/math]

Proof:

Proof: Real points between [math]\displaystyle{ r, s \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{Q} }[/math] do not avoid that every nontrivial equation for [math]\displaystyle{ c^k \gt 1 }[/math] is given by [math]\displaystyle{ (a^{m-r} + ib^{n-s})(a^r - ib^s) =c^k +i(a^rb^{n-s} - a^{m-r}b^s) }[/math] where all relations [math]\displaystyle{ a^{m-\hat{r}} = b^{n-\hat{s}} }[/math] then imply [math]\displaystyle{ p \mid }[/math] gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) }[/math] as well as the claim for [math]\displaystyle{ p \in {}^{\omega} \mathbb{P}.\square }[/math]

Conclusion:

The preceding theorem enables an infinite descent because of gcd[math]\displaystyle{ (a, b, c) \gt 1 }[/math] such that no [math]\displaystyle{ n \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}_{\ge 3} }[/math] satisfies [math]\displaystyle{ a^n + b^n = c^n }[/math] for arbitrary [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c \in {}^{\omega}\mathbb{N}^{*}.\square }[/math]

Recommended reading

Nonstandard Mathematics

Retrieved from "https://en.mwiki.de/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=265"